Project

Carbonify

The personal starting point

My family are farmers in India. The land is everything — it is livelihood, identity, and continuity across generations. When I started exploring climate technologies in 2022–2023, I kept running into one material that seemed to sit at an unusual intersection: biochar.

Biochar is charred organic material — biomass converted to stable carbon through pyrolysis. It is not new; ancient Amazonian farmers built the terra preta soils using a version of it. But the modern science behind why it works, and how to design it as an agri-input, has advanced considerably.

What struck me was the convergence:

  • Carbon sequestration: biochar carbon is recalcitrant — it stays in soil for centuries, not years, unlike most organic amendments
  • Soil biology: biochar's porous structure becomes habitat for beneficial microbial communities
  • Agronomic benefit: water retention, cation exchange capacity, pH buffering — especially valuable on the degraded soils that many Indian smallholders are farming
  • Farmgate economics: made from agricultural residue (which farmers often burn), so the feedstock is free and the inputs stay on-farm

The case felt strong enough to act on.

What we're building

In collaboration with my cousin, I'm developing advanced biochar-based biological agri-input products — not just raw biochar, but formulations that combine:

  • Biochar as the stable carbon carrier and microbial habitat matrix
  • Beneficial biological inputs (mycorrhizal fungi, PGPR bacteria) that colonize the biochar structure before application
  • Composting integration to create activated biochar compost with accelerated nutrient cycling

The goal is a product that a farmer can understand intuitively — add it to your field, improve your soil, reduce synthetic input dependency — while the underlying science does something that conventional inputs cannot: build long-term soil health rather than extract from it.

Why this matters for Indian agriculture

Indian soils have lost substantial organic carbon over decades of intensive monocropping and synthetic fertilizer dependency. Soil organic matter below 0.5% is common; anything under 1% is considered degraded. The consequences are real:

  • reduced water-holding capacity → more vulnerability to dry spells
  • weakened soil structure → erosion and crusting
  • declining microbial diversity → slower nutrient cycling
  • growing dependency on purchased inputs as natural fertility fades

Biochar-based inputs address the structural problem, not just the symptom.

Current status

Active development. We are trialing formulations on family farms — observing soil and crop response across a full season. The path forward involves expanding trials, refining formulations, and eventually making these products available to other farmers in the region.

This is a slow-moving project — agriculture runs on seasons. But it is deeply meaningful work.

More to explore