Lesson 15 of 15

Power Plant Studio

The capstone. Take a brief — a grid power station, a city's combined heat and power plant, or a heat pump for a whole town — and design the energy system that passes every test, judged live against the thermodynamics of every lesson.

6 min1 live simulation
you are here
The final exam

Fourteen lessons, three briefs. Can you design a plant that beats the competition?

There's no multiple choice here. You get a brief and a set of tests — efficiency, emissions, cost, materials, physical limits — and every law of the course pulling against the others.

How an energy-systems engineer thinks

Every brief in the studio is answered by the same chain of questions, each one a lesson:

  1. What is the product? Electricity is pure exergy; heat at 70 °C is mostly not (Lesson 7). A design that confuses them wastes fuel.
  2. Where does the heat come in, and at what temperature? The mean temperature of heat addition sets the ceiling (Lessons 5 and 8). A gas turbine takes heat in far hotter than any steam boiler (Lesson 9).
  3. Where does it go out? As cold as the environment allows — a condenser near the cooling-water temperature (Lesson 12) — unless the rejected heat is the product (Lesson 8's cogeneration).
  4. What do the materials allow? Steam above about 620 °C, turbine gas above about 1850 K, and steam wetter than 88% at the turbine exit are all off the table (Lessons 8 and 9).
  5. What about the exhaust? Too cool a stack and acids condense; too hot and you throw fuel away (Lessons 12 and 13).
  6. What does it cost, and what does it emit? Fuel price, carbon content and the carbon price, all divided by the efficiency (Lesson 13).

The studio

Choose a brief, then shape your plant. The block diagram shows your plant and its headline numbers; the test report on the right tells you what fails, why, and which lesson holds the fix. Your designs are saved in this browser.

CapstonePower Plant Studio
3/ 7 tests passed
fuelCoal boilerstack 420 KSteam turbine100 bar · 500 °CCondenser45 °Cfeedwaterη = 30.8%1104 g CO₂/kWh
Architecture
Steam cycle
100 bar
500 °C
45 °C
Exhaust
420 K · 147 °C
Test reportGrid power station
  1. Electrical efficiency30.8%≥ 55%Receive heat hotter and reject it colder — or stack a steam cycle under a gas turbine. Lesson 9 →
  2. CO₂ per kWh of electricity1104 g≤ 380 gCoal carries 70% more carbon per kWh of heat than gas; efficiency divides it all. Lesson 13 →
  3. Generating cost (fuel + carbon)€127.3/MWh≤ €80/MWhCheap fuel burned inefficiently, with a carbon price, is not cheap. Lesson 7 →
  4. Steam temperature (boiler steels)500 °C≤ 620 °C
  5. Turbine exhaust quality85.4%≥ 88%Wet steam erodes the last turbine blades: superheat more, or reheat. Lesson 8 →
  6. Stack above acid dew point420 K≥ 400 K
  7. Condenser temperature vs cooling water45 °C≥ 30 °C
Challenges0/3
  • Get the grid power station approved.
  • Get the city heat-and-power plant approved.
  • Get the town heat pump approved.
Every test is computed with the course’s own models: steam tables and the Rankine cycle, variable-property Brayton and combined cycles with a heat-recovery pinch, R-134a vapour compression, and the fuel data of Lesson 13. Prices: gas €28 and coal €12 per MWh of heat, carbon €80 per tonne, grid electricity 350 g CO₂/kWh. The trade-offs are real; the absolute numbers are indicative.

Design reviews

Stuck? These reviews describe one route through each brief. Try on your own first: the struggle is where the understanding forms.

Going deeper
Grid power station: why combined cycles took over

The default design is a 1950s-style coal plant: 100 bar, 500 °C, a warm condenser. It fails almost everything. Push it as far as the materials allow — 280 bar, 620 °C, reheat, a feedwater heater, a 32 °C condenser — and it climbs past 40%, but no coal plant can reach the 55% efficiency, the 380 g CO₂ limit or the cost target. Burning gas in the same boiler helps the carbon, not the efficiency.

Switch to a combined cycle. A pressure ratio around 18–22 and a turbine inlet temperature near the 1850 K limit give a gas turbine of about 40%, with exhaust near 850–900 K. Under it, a steam cycle at moderate pressure — 60–80 bar — keeps the turbine exhaust dry enough, and a condenser just above 30 °C finishes the job. You should land near 59–60%, about 340 g/kWh and around €74 per MWh. That is, almost exactly, why most new fossil plants of the past thirty years are combined cycles.

Going deeper
City heat and power: the condenser becomes the boiler

District heating needs water at 90 °C, so the steam must condense at 95 °C or more: a back-pressure turbine. That costs electricity — a steam plant exhausting at 95 °C makes only about 28% — but nearly all the rest of the fuel energy reaches the city as heat, so the fuel utilisation is excellent.

The electrical and exergetic tests are what rule the steam plant out. Heat at 70 °C is only about 15% exergy, so a plant whose output is mostly heat has a low exergetic efficiency, however well it uses the fuel's energy. A combined cycle with a back-pressure steam turbine fixes both: the gas turbine makes high-exergy electricity first, then its exhaust raises steam that is expanded and condensed into the district-heating water. Ask for a cool stack — the heat-recovery boiler's pinch will decide how cool it can really get — and you should see more than 50% electrical efficiency and a fuel utilisation near 90%.

Going deeper
Town heat pump: it's all about the lift

On a −5 °C design day, an air-source heat pump must lift heat from about −11 °C (the evaporator runs colder than the air) to 65 °C or more: a huge lift, a pressure ratio above 8, a hot compressor and a COP of about 2.5. It can't meet the 13 MW grid limit, and it barely beats gas boilers on carbon.

Change the source. River water at 4 °C gets you close but just misses the carbon target; a ground loop at 10 °C cuts the lift by about 15 K and gets there. Keep the supply temperature at the 60 °C the old radiators need — no higher. Choose a good compressor (80% or better) and add a few kelvin of subcooling, which increases the cooling effect per kilogram of refrigerant for free. The COP rises to about 3.5, the grid draw falls under 12 MW, and the CO₂ drops below half of what the gas boilers emitted — and it will keep falling as the grid decarbonises, which no boiler can do.

Recap
What the course built
  • Energy is conserved (Lessons 2 and 4): every device and cycle is a set of first-law balances.
  • Entropy is not (Lessons 5 and 6): the second law caps every engine, refrigerator and heat pump, and irreversibilities generate entropy.
  • Exergy says which losses matter (Lesson 7): combustion and big temperature differences destroy most of it; condensers reject little of it.
  • Cycles (Lessons 8–10) are engineered around those three facts: hot heat in, cold heat out, small temperature differences everywhere.
  • Properties, mixtures, reactions and equilibrium (Lessons 3, 11–14) supply the numbers — and the reasons flames never quite finish.

That's the course. You can now read any energy system — a car engine, a refrigerator, a power station, a planet — as a ledger of energy, entropy and exergy. Go and find the biggest destruction of exergy around you, and think about how you would fix it.

Finished this lesson?Mark it complete to track your progress through the course (saved in this browser).